Thursday, June 3, 2010

Ye To Prajatantra Hai: Democracy that is Yet to Arrive for Them.

It is the story of a village where nobody could read or write…it is the story of a city where still reigns a Marxist government but few have read Marx…it is the story of a basti where nobody knew about developmental economics. This is a place – my utopia which I write everyday but like a postmodern novel I am a character there – character-narrator-observer. Driving narrow alleys infested with playing children every day I reach my destination (that is where my destiny takes me) and as I reach my bent brow becomes straight – the sigh of relief.

Then one day writing entered the world of speech…Marx peeped through their windows…promises of development started spreading wings. The slumdogs also dreamt of becoming millionaires. As almost none of them could participate in Kaun Banega Crorepati the only other option seemed to cast votes. Collaboration with local party members demanding the minimum rights to live a life of dignity from which they are already and for always deprived seemed to be the politics of the governed. This is perhaps the only way ‘they’ come close to ‘us’ – make their presence felt.

Once I worked in a Govt. Sponsored so-called Bengali medium school (child of democracy and poverty in holy wedlock of unignorable understanding and negotiation) and shocked by the lack of discipline and uncouthness of the students there left my job in no time. I still remember how the students came to school after election results clad in colours. I would never forget how when I asked a class full of high school students about their future plans one answered boldly ‘I want to be a politician sir’. I remember when I was a school going boy a guy of my age from the basti once took up the challenge of walking down a park stark naked. I was shocked at his unabashed behavior – how his nakedness made me aware of my clothes.

Well election is not that important to me. I did not cast my vote this time as I felt none of the parties fit to be elected. The act of casting vote is a choice for me. I can step back and say no. But what about those whose very presence cannot be justified by law – who are either dispossessed or never possessed any civic rights at all in the drama of democracy where they can act only as chorus. Yes, they report us of the violence of electoral system. Somebody like Bapi Dhar’s death can never be represented on stage – it can only be known and felt when choric lament reach our ears and we are yet to decide whether he was an anti-social or a social worker.

Perhaps we are clad with the garb of democracy so much that we don’t realize we are wearing clothes. We are citizens and shall remain so whether we cast our votes or not. They are never fully citizens and perhaps can never be. Injustice is so much that we can only think of reducing it and can hardly hope for ‘justice’ (Do I dare to invoke Amartya Sen in this messy argument?). Democracy is only a promise for them that is yet to come (never think my fertile brain is trying to drag Derrida here!) and they cast their votes to bargain it. They play the game of dressing and undressing while we already take our clothes to be our skin. Election sometimes pushes us to confront nakedness – garbing and ungarbing of democracy. After the Municipality election results were out when I was returning from an adda at one of my professor’s place where the farce of democracy was critically dissected I took an usual shortcut through a slum. I caught sight of some young boys playing on the streets. Jumping from the walls they were yelling ‘Debada jiteche! Debada jiteche!’ i.e. ‘Debada has won! Debada has won!’ Debada is the nickname of our local councilor. Till then my only engagement with the garb of electoral excitement was through Television news coverage and critical discussion in our addas. Now I confronted its nakedness – half naked children uttering slogans – perhaps their demands of democracy! When I was of that age I learnt reading and writing – I studied history, geography and literature but like Caliban they learn language to abuse even before receiving any formal education creating the unbridgeable gap between us and them. Perhaps this trauma of recognition or misrecognition is the predicament of any Indian scholar who chooses to study his ‘own’ people from whom his education and acculturation always keeps at a distance. In times of election while looking at them I learn to ask the question – ‘Who am I?’

2 comments:

  1. This is a subject writing to the Emperor :-)

    Just felt inspired (and perhaps stupefied) enough to think of re-reading the emperor's new clothes! While the child you talk of unabashedly walks naked, another child in some fictional time-space tells the authority that he is naked. That he should thus be ashamed - both for his nakedness and the fact that he could not realize it himself, and the fact that all his subjects saw him as naked and stupid - and thus as an incapable ruler, an impotent monarch, a failed sovereign, thereby unveiling the blindness, the ignorance of the authority, of power itself, of autocracy. The child you saw does nothing of the kind; he decides to wear nakedness himself. And this time he is aware, he is agentic, he is with knowledge - of the fact that his entire body is visible to anyone who would turn to look, that he is creating a sensation, that he is precipitating disturbance and causing unease to onlookers. Yet it appears that he has taken up a challenge, and is thus determined to 'win'. He has charted out his gains and losses ahead: display of his nakedness is not a loss (as it was for the king) but a gain that helps him get whatever the bet was for. Am just being foolhardy enough to think aloud - from the days of autocratic engagements with people when nakedness seemed a failure, yet a failure that none could point out and that had to depend on an untrained (untrained with worldly matters and consequences of spilling out the truth) child's exclamations, from the instance when nakedness meant shame for the wearer of it, perhaps in the democratic space the unclad can dare to run down the park or jump on and off the wall proclaiming victory. [Bengal's Dada also took off his shirt and created much stir; it too was a proclamation of victory].As if the symbolic nakedness is now to stay - a sign of democracy, a dress for the democratic subject, for both the members of the civil society and political - for the former it means passion and aggression, for the latter a show of untutored joy.

    Just a small footnote: in all this grandiloquent talk of nakedness and its wearers, it is the man who we are talking about. For the woman it has always been a matter of shame. It continues to be, in varying degrees though.]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your wise observations. according to logic of governmentality all citizen subjects can be emperor and the subject at the same time in his/her own ways. We live in a society where authority is invisible as it is dispersed among those on whom it is imposed. Such is the paradox of modern political formation. You rightly have pointed out that nakedness is often conscious on the part of the democratic subjects but for the civil society the nakedness of the political society might appear distanced and alien. Unlike the naked king 'we', the members of civil society often consider ourselves clothed and don't afford to get naked that easily. Perhaps 'we' have better fall back options. It might seem that nakedness is barbaric. The political activities of marginalized sections demanding rights however are conscious if not pro-grammatic. Since it does not follow a 'grammar' as Gramsci would suggest we might think it a product of ignorance and illiteracy. Upto this point I would follow Partha Chatterjee (Politics of the Governed) but my question would be how these two systems of politics of the governed and modern democratic citizenship goes together. Does it continue to posit a elite-subaltern binary in form of civil-political society? Does the repeated performance of acts of paralegal resistances actually empower the dis-empowered or just stop at reducing some amount of injustice whereas helping to continue the miscommunication between two sections of the society? I don't know for sure. We still need to work this out. I am grateful to you for pointing out the lacuna in my thinking. I wondered how we think by excluding the woman always and already. Yes, the act of voluntary disrobing would be unthinkable for a woman. It would be an act of shame and humiliation. At the most it can be an act of extreme resistance when all forms of 'normalcy' is jeopardized as it happened with women protesting military atrocities at Manipur. Mostly all political actions including the micro-politics of the governed are always male-oriented even if women do participate. May be only through such epistemic counter-violence like throwing off their robes the mothers of Manipur can let their voices heard. In other so-called normal times they are bound to remain silent or their voices are subsumed into the rhetoric of the man made world.

    Anyways thanks again for pointing out the nakedness of this pauper emperor trying to cloth himself behind beguiling words...

    ReplyDelete